On March 26, 2020, the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General made Ministerial Order M086 pursuant to the Emergency Program Act, titled the Limitation Periods (COVID-19) Order. This Ministerial Order reflects the significant impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on all aspects of society, including legal proceedings. This Order acknowledges that it may not be possible for a person involved in legal or administrative proceedings to take steps within the timeframe required by legislation. As such, commencing March 26, 2020 and continuing until the provincial state of emergency expires or is cancelled, every mandatory limitation period and any other mandatory time period for the commencement of a “civil or family action, proceeding, claim or appeal” in the Provincial Court, Supreme Court or Court of Appeal is suspended. Additionally, any decisions required to be made within a statutorily defined timeframe by a person, tribunal, or other body may be waived, suspended, or extended by that decision maker.
Of note, the suspension of limitation periods does not appear to apply to deadlines for filing with tribunals or other administrative bodies.
A party wishing to nonetheless file a claim with the BC Supreme Court during this suspension, may do so electronically or in accordance with this court announcement.
On March 23, 2020, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, British Columbia made two amendments to its Employment Standards Act, RSBC 1996, c 113 (the “ESA”) in order to protect employees affected by illness or injury. Local governments employ workers in a number of respects, and many of those individuals will likely be entitled to the protections afforded by these recent ESA amendments, which include the following: (more…)
The Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General has now made three Ministerial Orders pursuant to the Emergency Program Act. The following is a summary of what each order provides. These Orders apply during the declared state of emergency made on March 18, 2020. The following is a summary of what each Order provides. A link to the full text of each Order is included. (more…)
While local governments grapple with taking the lead in their communities to best protect the health and safety of their populations they must be careful to ensure that there is a basis of statutory authority for the steps they are taking. Failing to do so could otherwise potentially place elected officials or senior staff at risk for what has been described in law as the “Category B” element of the tort of misfeasance of office, which is “a public officer who acts with knowledge both that she or he has no power to do the act complained of and that the act is likely to injure the plaintiff.“ (Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse,  3 S.C.R. 263). (more…)
The Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General declared a state of provincial emergency on March 18, 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. A number of local governments are now considering whether they should also declare a state of local emergency. The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General recently sent a letter to municipal mayors and regional district chairs, concerning the exercise of local government powers under the Emergency Program Act, in light of the declaration of a state of provincial emergency. The position of the Province is that the provincial declaration does not prevent a local authority from declaring a state of local emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, if it thinks it advisable to do so. (more…)
The circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic may give rise to new challenges pertaining to homeless populations within the jurisdictions of local governments. Although decisions of British Columbia Supreme Court over the last two years have clarified and confirmed that responsibility for homelessness lies with the Province and not with local governments, it is recognized for practical purposes that municipalities and regional districts are most often the level of government most directly impacted by homelessness. While the law which has arisen from the decisions of the Courts has general application across the Province, the circumstances and experience of each local government are different, as will be the response. We have been deeply involved in these issues for the past number of years and are in a position to provide you with efficient, summary advice relating to this issue. For more information contact Jeff Locke at email@example.com
Notwithstanding the gravity of the crisis which British Columbia and the rest of the world is facing, local governments may find themselves dealing with businesses that choose to ignore the clear directions provided by Provincial public health officials. While it is expected that Provincial authorities will take the lead on enforcing public health orders, local governments also have a number of enforcement tools at their disposal and may be better positioned to act quickly to protect their communities. For example, on March 19th the City of Delta revoked the business licence of a “hot yoga” studio which was making false claims, including that the heat of the yoga studio would kill the COVID-19 virus. In addition to revoking a business licence, a more direct and consequential remedy may be available through an injunction sought from the British Columbia Supreme Court. As of March 18th the normal operations of the Court have been suspended save for urgent matters, but it is expected that urgent matters pertaining to the current crisis will be among the limited matters which the Courts will hear. For more information contact Jeff Locke (firstname.lastname@example.org) or Bob Macquisten (email@example.com).
The Provincial Health Officer declared a public health emergency on March 17, 2020. The Declaration is authorized under Part 5 – Emergency Powers of the Public Health Act.
Local governments should be aware that during an emergency Part 5 of the Public Health Act applies despite any provision of the Public Health Act or any other enactment to the extent that there is any inconsistency or conflict with that provision or another enactment. This includes in relation to the collection, use or disclosure of personal information, the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the Personal Information Protection Act. Further, this also applies to a provision that would impose a specific duty, limit or procedural requirement in respect of a specific person or thing.
Local Governments should be aware that under section 83 of the Public Health Act a local government is required to take certain steps when it becomes aware of a health hazard in its jurisdiction including reporting a health hazard to a health officer or taking an action that the local government has authority to take under the Public Health Act or another enactment to respond to the health hazard. Further, they must provide health officers with information that health officers require and consider advice or information provided to them by a health officer. (more…)
The Reporting Information Affecting Public Health Regulation, B.C. Reg. 167/2018 requires at section 4 that any person in charge of an institution or workplace who has been advised by a Medical Health Officer that a person who is or has been present at the institution or workplace is an infected person must, if requested by the Medical Health Officer, report the contact information, if known, of each person who may have been exposed to the infected person and make a report to the Medical Health Officer in the form and manner required by the Medical Health Officer.
The novel coronavirus is a prescribed infectious agent in the Schedule to the Regulation.